One partner across the full engineering pipeline, from first concept sketch to a validated, production-ready design, solver-agnostic and automation-backed at every step.
From concept to detailed, manufacturable CAD.
From Concept to CAD
We take mechanical parts, products and assemblies from early concept to fully detailed CAD, working across SolidWorks, FreeCAD and Rhinoceros. Parametric, feature-based modelling keeps designs flexible as requirements evolve, while assembly tolerancing and interference checks catch problems before they ever reach the shop floor, backed by clean 2D drafting and GD&T-ready drawings.
Tools We Use
Shell, tetra & hexa meshes, built for your solver.
Meshing for Every Solver
Good simulation starts with a good mesh. We build shell, tetra and hexa meshes in ANSA, matched to the geometry in front of us: shell for thin-walled and sheet-metal structures, tetra for complex irregular parts, hexa where crash and structural models demand higher fidelity. Every mesh is checked against solver-specific quality criteria, Jacobian, warpage, skewness, before it’s handed off ready to run.
Tools We Use
The right solver for the question you’re asking.
Crash, Structural & Durability
Whether the question is how a structure survives an impact or how it holds up over years of fatigue loading, we run the simulation in whichever solver fits the job. Crash and impact work goes through LS-DYNA and PAM-CRASH; linear and nonlinear structural analysis runs in Nastran and Abaqus. Boundary conditions, load cases and material models are set up to match real-world behaviour, and every solver deck goes through QA/QC before the results are trusted.
Tools We Use
From raw solver output to a clear answer.
Turning Results into Decisions
Raw solver output isn’t a deliverable, an answer is. We extract and interpret results, stress, strain, displacement, energy, and evaluate them against your design targets, tracing failures back to their root cause when something doesn’t pass. The result is a clear engineering report with plots, findings and specific recommendations your team can act on, not a folder of contour plots to decode.
Tools We Use
Focus Areas
Less repetitive setup, more engineering judgment.
Engineering at Scale
A lot of engineering time gets lost to repetitive setup work, so we script it away. Custom automation handles repeatable CAD, meshing and post-processing tasks and drives batch processing for large design-of-experiments studies, while machine learning models add predictive power for design optimization. The result is shorter turnaround and more engineering time spent on judgment calls, automation built around the tools and workflow you already use.
Capabilities
How We Work Together
Fixed scope, fixed timeline and fixed deliverables, ideal for a defined design or simulation package.
Dedicated engineering capacity for continuous design, simulation or automation needs.
Flexible, on-demand expert support for specific tasks, reviews or troubleshooting.
Questions
Yes. We’re glad to sign your NDA before any project details are shared, confidentiality is standard practice for CAE consulting.
No. We can start as early as concept sketches and take a project through CAD, meshing and simulation, or step in at any single stage, meshing only or simulation only, whichever your team needs.
Whichever fits the physics of your problem. We’re solver-agnostic across LS-DYNA, PAM-CRASH, Nastran and Abaqus, and we’ll recommend the right one rather than defaulting to a single license.
Yes. Our automation and scripting work is built around the tools and workflow you already use, not the other way around.
Tell us what you’re building, we’ll tell you which service, or combination, gets you there fastest.
Get in Touch